For a smart door lock with keyless Wi-Fi, the Schlage Encode is my best overall pick for buyers who want a recognizable deadbolt design and built-in remote access. The Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 stands out for fingerprint entry and weather resistance, while the eufy Smart Lock C220 is a compelling fingerprint-focused alternative. The main tradeoffs are whether you want a deadbolt or a full handle set, which entry methods matter, and how much setup or app dependence you’ll accept. Built-in Wi-Fi can simplify remote control, but it may affect battery life and does not replace a dependable backup entry method. Read on for the full breakdown and help matching a lock to your door and routine.
Get your wardrobe favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Key Takeaways
- The Schlage Encode leads this lineup for straightforward Wi-Fi deadbolt use: it is the clearest fit for buyers who prioritize remote access in a familiar deadbolt format over a handle-and-lock combination.
- Fingerprint entry is the strongest point of difference: Wyze and eufy put biometric access at the center, while several Philips, Veise, TEEHO, and multi-method models offer fingerprint access alongside keypad or app control.
- Handle-set listings need closer fit checks: a lock with a handle may suit a door replacement project, but buyers must confirm the handing, latch, hole spacing, and existing hardware before ordering.
- The roundup includes repeated and closely related listings: Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock appears twice, and several Philips and Veise models share broad feature themes, so compare the exact model and included hardware rather than relying on a brand name alone.
- Built-in Wi-Fi is not the same as a complete access plan: keypad, fingerprint, card, key, and voice options differ by model; choose backup entry methods that still work if the app, home network, or batteries do not.
| TEEHO TE012W-H WiFi Fingerprint Door Lock – Matte Black | ![]() | Best Overall for Built-In Wi-Fi and Fingerprint Access | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, passcode, backup key, app, voice | Fingerprint capacity: 20 fingerprints | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Built-in WiFi Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Remote Access & Auto-Lock, Keyless Entry for Home, Airbnb & Rental, 6-in-1 Unlock | ![]() | Best for Rental Hosts Who Need Multiple Entry Methods | Brand and model: Sifely S WiFi | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, keypad code, RFID card, app, physical key, Alexa and Google voice compatibility | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black | ![]() | Best for Privacy-Minded Buyers Who Can Add a Gateway | Connectivity: Wi-Fi remote access via separately sold G1 Gateway | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, RFID card, keypad code, mechanical key | Security: AES128 encrypted local storage, anti-peeping password, intrusion alarms | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control, Voice & Fingerprint Unlock, Satin Nickel | ![]() | Best for Buyers Who Want a Matched Handle Set | Brand and model: PHILIPS DDL242X-1HW | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, passcode, app, voice | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Keyless Entry Smart Lock with Wi-Fi, AI Learning Scanner, Auto-Lock, Backup Keys, IP53 Weather-Resistant | ![]() | Best for a Fingerprint-Focused Deadbolt | Brand and model: WYZE WLCKB2 | Lock type: Biometric keypad deadbolt | Connectivity and control: Wi-Fi and Wyze app | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, App Control Smart Deadbolt Lock | ![]() | Best for Keypad-First Remote Access | Model: DDL242X-15HW-L | Access methods: Key, passcode, app, and voice commands | Voice compatibility: Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE027-K WiFi Smart Deadbolt Locks with 2 Knobs Set, Matte Black | ![]() | Best for Multi-Method Entry | Model: VE027-K | Access methods: Wi-Fi app, fingerprint, IC card, PIN, key, and voice | Fingerprint capacity: 20 fingerprints | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black | ![]() | Best for Security-Focused Simplicity | Model: BE489WBCEN622 | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | App: Schlage Home | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE012W WiFi Fingerprint Smart Lock for Front Door, Satin Nickel | ![]() | Best for Fast Fingerprint Access | Material: Zinc alloy | Access methods: App, fingerprint, PIN, physical key, and voice | Fingerprint recognition speed: 0.2 seconds | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, App Remote Control | ![]() | Best for Fingerprint-and-Keypad Convenience | Model: DDL242X-1HW-L | Connectivity: 2.4GHz Wi-Fi; no hub needed | Access methods: Fingerprint, keypad, app, and voice commands | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock | ![]() | Best for High-Capacity Access Sharing | Brand: PHILIPS | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Entry methods: Fingerprint, passcode, physical key, voice commands, and app control | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Smart Lock Keypad Door Lock with Handle, WiFi Keyless Entry, Alexa & Google Assistant Compatible, Voice Control, APP Remote, Fingerprint, PIN Code, Mechanical Key | ![]() | Best for Multiple Backup Entry Methods | Entry methods: Fingerprint, passcode, app, voice, FOB card, and mechanical key | Fingerprint capacity: 50 | Passcode capacity: 50 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock | ![]() | Best for Straightforward DIY Installation | Brand: PHILIPS | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Lock type: Smart deadbolt | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Tapo Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Door Lock, Keyless Tactile Buttons, DL100 | ![]() | Best for Flexible Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Use | Model: DL100 | Connectivity: Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | Entry methods: Keypad, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and voice commands | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Smart Lock C220 – Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock | ![]() | Best for Bridge-Free Remote Access | Model: T8506 | Lock type: Deadbolt | Entry methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, and Alexa or Google voice | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart door lock keyless wifi | Connectivity | Battery life | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEEHO TE012W-H WiFi Fingerprin | Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi | — | — |
| Built-in WiFi Fingerprint Smar | Wi-Fi | Up to 6 months | — |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | Wi-Fi remote access via separately sold G1 Gateway | — | — |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock | Built-in Wi-Fi | — | — |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerp | — | — | — |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock | — | Up to 6 months | DDL242X-15HW-L |
| Veise VE027-K WiFi Smart Deadb | 2.4GHz Wi-Fi | Up to 240 days | VE027-K |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | Wi-Fi | Up to 6 months | BE489WBCEN622 |
| Veise VE012W WiFi Fingerprint | — | — | — |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt w | 2.4GHz Wi-Fi; no hub needed | Up to 6 months | DDL242X-1HW-L |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | — | — | DDL242X-1HW |
| Smart Lock Keypad Door Lock wi | Wi-Fi | Up to 8 months | — |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | — | — | DDL242X-1HW |
| Tapo Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Door | Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | Up to 200 days in Wi-Fi mode; up to 300 days in Bluetooth mode | DL100 |
| eufy Smart Lock C220 | — | Up to 8 months | T8506 |
More Details on Our Top Picks
TEEHO TE012W-H WiFi Fingerprint Door Lock – Matte Black
The TEEHO TE012W-H is a strong fit for buyers who want remote access without a separate gateway and a fingerprint reader for quick everyday entry. Its built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi supports app control and voice commands, while the lock also accepts passcodes and backup keys. Compared with the Veise VE017, which needs a separately sold G1 Gateway for remote access, TEEHO makes the Wi-Fi setup more direct. Its stated capacity of 20 fingerprints and 100-plus passcodes also suits a busy household or small rental.
The tradeoff is that remote functions depend on a 2.4GHz network, and battery life varies with use. Buyers who want RFID cards as another entry method may prefer the Sifely S WiFi, which adds that option. I’d choose TEEHO for straightforward built-in Wi-Fi access, not for a household that needs card entry or broader network compatibility.
Pros:- Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi enables app-based remote control without a separate gateway.
- Fingerprint, passcode, backup-key, app, and voice access give household members several ways to enter.
- Supports 20 fingerprints and more than 100 passcodes for multiple users or guests.
- Zinc alloy construction and an installation design for standard U.S. doors.
Cons:- Remote features require a 2.4GHz Wi-Fi connection.
- Battery life can vary with use, and the lock requires eight AA batteries.
- Does not list RFID card entry, unlike the Sifely S WiFi.
Best for: Households and small rental hosts who want built-in Wi-Fi, fingerprint entry, and room for many access codes without buying a gateway.
Not ideal for: Buyers with only 5GHz Wi-Fi or those who want RFID card access as part of the lock’s entry options.
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, passcode, backup key, app, voice
- Fingerprint capacity:20 fingerprints
- Passcode capacity:100+ passcodes
- Stated fingerprint performance:0.2-second recognition; 99.99% accuracy stated by the manufacturer
- Battery:8 AA batteries; stated life over 8 months
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Installation:Fits standard U.S. doors; described as easy to install
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“Choose the TEEHO TE012W-H if you want built-in Wi-Fi and fingerprint entry with ample code capacity, and can use a 2.4GHz network.”
Built-in WiFi Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with Handle & Keypad – Remote Access & Auto-Lock, Keyless Entry for Home, Airbnb & Rental, 6-in-1 Unlock
The Sifely S WiFi is the most access-method-focused pick in this group: residents and guests can use fingerprint, keypad code, RFID card, app, physical key, or voice. That breadth can simplify handoffs for a rental host who needs to accommodate different guests, rather than relying on one person’s fingerprint or smartphone. Like the TEEHO TE012W-H, it offers Wi-Fi remote access and fingerprint entry, but Sifely adds RFID cards and an emergency Type-C power port.
That flexibility comes with practical limits. Its stated battery life is up to six months, shorter than TEEHO’s stated period of over eight months, and installation is specified for standard U.S. door thicknesses and backsets. The product data also does not specify user capacities. I’d favor Sifely when varied entry methods and emergency power matter more than longer stated battery life or clearly listed code capacity.
Pros:- Six listed entry methods, including RFID cards, offer flexibility for guests and household members.
- Wi-Fi supports remote access and lock-status monitoring.
- Type-C emergency power port provides a backup option when batteries run down.
- DIY installation specifications cover common U.S. door thicknesses and backsets.
Cons:- Stated battery life is up to six months, shorter than TEEHO’s stated period of over eight months.
- Fit is limited to the stated standard door thickness and backset ranges.
- The supplied product data does not list fingerprint or passcode capacity.
Best for: Airbnb and rental-property hosts who need to offer guests a choice of fingerprint, code, card, app, key, or voice entry.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking a lock with a clearly stated high user capacity or longer stated battery life; its listed battery life is up to six months.
- Brand and model:Sifely S WiFi
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad code, RFID card, app, physical key, Alexa and Google voice compatibility
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Backup power:Type-C emergency port
- Material:Zinc alloy handle and deadbolt
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 2-1/4 inches
- Backset:2-3/8 or 2-3/4 inches
- Included components:Mounting hardware, bolt assembly, two keys, and two key cards
Our verdict“Pick the Sifely S WiFi for rental properties where varied guest entry methods and an emergency power port matter more than battery-life claims or published user capacity.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black
The Veise VE017 stands out for its local encrypted storage and access controls, including an anti-peeping password and intrusion alarms. It offers fingerprint, keypad, RFID, app, and mechanical-key entry, so it can cover a household’s needs even without relying on one access method. Its stated battery life of at least 12 months is longer than the Sifely S WiFi’s up-to-six-month claim, making it appealing to buyers who want fewer battery changes.
The key distinction from the TEEHO TE012W-H is how Wi-Fi works: Veise requires a separately sold G1 Gateway for remote access, while TEEHO has built-in Wi-Fi. That adds a purchase and setup step for anyone who wants control away from home. The lock also uses four AA batteries that are not included and carries an IP55 rating, so it is a weaker fit for harsh exposure. I’d choose it for local security features, not turnkey remote access.
Pros:- AES128 encrypted local storage is specified for stored data.
- Fingerprint, app, RFID, keypad, and mechanical-key entry provide several access paths.
- Anti-peeping password and intrusion alarms add listed security features.
- Stated battery life is at least 12 months.
Cons:- Remote access requires a separately sold G1 Gateway, unlike the TEEHO TE012W-H’s built-in Wi-Fi.
- Four AA/LR6 batteries are not included.
- IP55 rating is not intended for extreme weather exposure.
Best for: Privacy-conscious homeowners who value local encrypted storage and multiple entry methods, and are willing to add the G1 Gateway for remote access.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want Wi-Fi remote control straight out of the box or need a lock suited to extreme outdoor weather.
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi remote access via separately sold G1 Gateway
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, RFID card, keypad code, mechanical key
- Security:AES128 encrypted local storage, anti-peeping password, intrusion alarms
- Material:All-zinc alloy with scratch-resistant finish
- Battery:4 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries, not included
- Stated battery life:At least 12 months
- Installation:DIY, no drilling; supports left- and right-handed doors
- Warranty:1-year limited; extendable to 2 years with registration
Our verdict“Choose the Veise VE017 if local encryption and a long stated battery life matter more than having remote Wi-Fi built in.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, Built-in WiFi, APP Remote Control, Voice & Fingerprint Unlock, Satin Nickel
This Philips lock is a good match for buyers replacing both a lock and a lever: the package includes a door lever set alongside the smart lock, and built-in Wi-Fi supports remote management through the Philips Home Access App. Fingerprint entry, passcodes, auto-lock, and Alexa or Google voice control cover the everyday features many households want. Compared with the Veise VE017, remote access does not require buying a separate gateway, making the Philips setup more straightforward for Wi-Fi use.
The supplied specifications are less detailed than those for TEEHO or Sifely: they do not state fingerprint or code capacity, battery life, or material construction beyond the satin-nickel finish. It also requires eight AA batteries, sold separately, and fits a narrower stated door-thickness range than Sifely. I’d shortlist Philips when a coordinated handle set and built-in remote access are priorities, but verify door fit before ordering.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi supports app-based remote control and access management without a listed separate gateway.
- Includes a door lever set and installation hardware.
- Offers fingerprint, passcode, and voice-control access with auto-lock functionality.
- Stated 0.3-second fingerprint unlocking provides a quick entry option.
Cons:- Eight AA alkaline batteries are not included.
- Specified door thickness is narrower than Sifely’s listed fit range.
- Product data does not provide battery-life or user-capacity figures.
Best for: Homeowners replacing a door lock and lever together who want app-based remote management, fingerprint entry, and voice control.
Not ideal for: Buyers with doors outside the stated 1-3/8 to 1-3/4-inch thickness range or anyone wanting published battery-life and user-capacity figures.
- Brand and model:PHILIPS DDL242X-1HW
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, passcode, app, voice
- App:Philips Home Access App
- Voice compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant
- Fingerprint performance:0.3-second unlocking stated
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Batteries:8 AA alkaline batteries, not included
- Included components:Two door levers, latch assembly, installation hardware, and smart lock
Our verdict“Choose this Philips model if you want a handle and smart lock in one package with built-in Wi-Fi, after confirming your door falls within its fit range.”
Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Keyless Entry Smart Lock with Wi-Fi, AI Learning Scanner, Auto-Lock, Backup Keys, IP53 Weather-Resistant
The Wyze Lock Bolt v2 is the most focused deadbolt pick here for buyers who want fingerprint entry, Wi-Fi app control, and auto-lock in one unit. Its scanner is specified to unlock in under half a second, and AI learning is intended to improve recognition over time. Unlike the Philips DDL242X-1HW, which includes a handle set, Wyze is a deadbolt option, so it suits shoppers who want to replace the bolt rather than buy a coordinated lever package. Eight AA batteries are included, unlike those Philips batteries.
Wyze offers keypad, app, fingerprint, and backup-key access, but the supplied description does not list voice compatibility or RFID cards, both available on the Sifely S WiFi. Its IP53 weather rating and BHMA2 durability classification are useful details, though buyers in exposed locations should not treat it as suitable for extreme conditions. I’d pick it for a straightforward fingerprint-led deadbolt, not for broad entry-method variety.
Pros:- Fingerprint scanner is specified to unlock in under half a second, with AI learning technology.
- Wi-Fi and the Wyze app provide remote management.
- Fingerprint, keypad, app, and backup-key access cover several everyday entry needs.
- Includes eight AA batteries and has an IP53 weather-resistance rating.
Cons:- IP53 rating is not intended for extreme weather conditions.
- Product data does not list RFID card or Alexa and Google voice access, unlike Sifely.
- App setup or configuration may be complex for some buyers.
Best for: Homeowners who want a Wi-Fi-connected deadbolt centered on fast fingerprint entry, app control, and auto-lock.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need RFID cards, listed voice-assistant compatibility, or a lock for exposure to severe weather.
- Brand and model:WYZE WLCKB2
- Lock type:Biometric keypad deadbolt
- Connectivity and control:Wi-Fi and Wyze app
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, backup keys
- Fingerprint performance:Under 0.5-second unlocking stated; AI learning scanner
- Battery:8 AA batteries included
- Stated battery life:Up to 8 months
- Weather resistance:IP53
- Durability classification:BHMA2
Our verdict“Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 if you want a fingerprint-led Wi-Fi deadbolt with auto-lock and included batteries, rather than a handle set or card-based access.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock with Handle, App Control Smart Deadbolt Lock
I’d choose this Philips when remote app control and passcodes matter more than fingerprint entry. It combines a keypad, physical key, and voice commands with Alexa and Google Assistant, giving household members several ways in without adding a fingerprint sensor. Compared with the Philips 4200 Series, it does not list fingerprint access, so it is less convenient for people who want a quick biometric entry. Its handle set and IP54 weather resistance make it a flexible fit for a range of home or office entries, while the stated compatibility is limited to standard US deadbolts. The tradeoffs are practical: eight AA batteries are not included, and installation may take more technical familiarity than a basic replacement lock. I’d rank it for buyers who want straightforward code-based access and remote control, not the broadest entry-method menu.
Pros:- App-based remote control supports access management away from home.
- Passcode, key, and voice-command options provide alternatives when a phone is unavailable.
- IP54 rating and stated pressure resistance suit buyers seeking a weather-resistant lock.
- Includes two lever handles, giving the set a broader entry-hardware scope than a deadbolt-only option.
Cons:- Eight AA batteries are not included, adding a separate setup task.
- Does not list fingerprint access, unlike the Philips 4200 Series and both Veise picks in this group.
- Installation may require more technical familiarity, and fit is limited to standard US deadbolts.
Best for: Households or small offices that want remote access, customizable passcodes, and a physical-key backup on a standard US deadbolt.
Not ideal for: People who want fingerprint unlocking or a lock for a nonstandard door, since fingerprint access is not listed and compatibility is limited to standard US deadbolts.
- Model:DDL242X-15HW-L
- Access methods:Key, passcode, app, and voice commands
- Voice compatibility:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Battery type:8 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Temperature range:-31°F to 150°F (-35°C to 66°C)
- Door compatibility:Most standard US deadbolts
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if keypad codes and remote access are your priorities and you do not need fingerprint entry.”
Veise VE027-K WiFi Smart Deadbolt Locks with 2 Knobs Set, Matte Black
The Veise VE027-K is the most varied entry-method choice in this group: it lists fingerprint, IC card, PIN, key, app, and voice control. That breadth suits a household where different people prefer different ways in, while 20 fingerprint slots give it a clearer capacity advantage over the Philips locks, which do not list fingerprint entry on the comparable keypad model. Its 2.4GHz Wi-Fi supports app-based remote management and alerts, but those remote features depend on a stable connection. The stated ANSI Grade 3 standard and compatibility with common US door thicknesses add useful fit and durability guidance. The compromise is a larger setup and upkeep burden: eight AA batteries are not included, and the many access options may be more than a simple code-and-app buyer needs. I’d pick it over the Schlage Encode for entry flexibility, not for a more established security-focused feature set.
Pros:- Six listed access methods accommodate varied user preferences.
- Stores up to 20 fingerprints, useful for households with multiple regular users.
- ANSI Grade 3 specification gives buyers a stated security standard for comparison.
- DIY installation is listed for standard US doors without wiring.
Cons:- Eight AA batteries are not included and are listed for replacement every few months.
- Remote management and alerts rely on a stable 2.4GHz Wi-Fi connection.
- Its many access methods may add setup complexity for buyers who only need a keypad.
Best for: Families or shared homes with several users who want fingerprint, card, PIN, key, and app entry on a standard US door.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want a simple keypad-and-app lock or cannot rely on 2.4GHz Wi-Fi for remote access and alerts.
- Model:VE027-K
- Access methods:Wi-Fi app, fingerprint, IC card, PIN, key, and voice
- Fingerprint capacity:20 fingerprints
- Connectivity:2.4GHz Wi-Fi
- Battery type:8 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Up to 240 days
- Security standard:BHMA/ANSI Grade 3
- Door compatibility:Standard US doors, 1-3/8 to 2 inches thick
- Installation time:10–15 minutes
Our verdict“Pick the VE027-K if your household will use its broad mix of fingerprint, card, PIN, and remote access options.”
Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Deadbolt Lock with Century Trim, Matte Black
I’d put the Schlage Encode ahead of the other picks for buyers who want a deadbolt-first design with built-in Wi-Fi and security-focused features, rather than a handle set or fingerprint reader. Its encrypted connection and built-in alarm distinguish it from the Veise VE012W, which emphasizes biometric entry and multiple access methods instead. Alexa and Google Home compatibility add voice control, and the Schlage Home app provides remote management without hardwiring. The package includes four AA batteries, so it asks for less initial battery shopping than the Philips and Veise models that list batteries as not included. That convenience does not remove upkeep: battery life is listed at up to six months. The touchscreen may also feel sensitive or unresponsive to some users, and the door-thickness range is narrower than Veise’s. I’d favor it when security features and a straightforward Wi-Fi deadbolt matter more than fingerprints or a handle replacement.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables app-based remote management without a separate hub listed.
- Encrypted connection and built-in alarms address security concerns beyond basic keyless entry.
- Includes four AA batteries, unlike the battery-excluded Philips and Veise alternatives.
- Mechanical and finish warranty coverage is listed for the lifetime of the product.
Cons:- No fingerprint access is listed, unlike the Veise VE027-K and VE012W.
- Touchscreen response may not suit every user.
- Its listed door-thickness range is narrower than the Veise models’ stated range.
Best for: Homeowners seeking a Wi-Fi deadbolt with app control, voice compatibility, encrypted connection, and a built-in alarm.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want fingerprint unlocking, a handle set, or compatibility with doors thicker than the listed 1-3/4-inch maximum.
- Model:BE489WBCEN622
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- App:Schlage Home
- Voice compatibility:Amazon Alexa and Google Home
- Security features:Encrypted connection and built-in alarms
- Battery type:4 AA batteries, included
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; 3-year electronics
Our verdict“Choose the Schlage Encode if security-focused deadbolt features matter more to you than fingerprint entry or a bundled handle.”
Veise VE012W WiFi Fingerprint Smart Lock for Front Door, Satin Nickel
The VE012W makes the most sense for buyers who want fingerprint entry as the everyday shortcut, while keeping PIN, key, app, and voice options available. Its listed 0.2-second recognition speed gives a concrete reason to favor it for quick entry; the Veise VE027-K offers more varied access through IC cards and a stated 20-fingerprint capacity, but this model highlights its fingerprint recognition performance instead. Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control without a hub, so it can manage access from a phone when you are away. The tradeoffs are setup and dependency: full remote features require a smartphone, and the product information flags setup as potentially complex. Eight AA batteries are not included, either. I’d place it above the keypad-focused Philips DDL242X-15HW-L for biometric convenience, but below a simpler lock for anyone who prefers fewer setup steps.
Pros:- Lists fingerprint recognition speed of 0.2 seconds for quick access.
- Combines fingerprint, PIN, physical key, app, and voice-command entry.
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control without a hub.
- Fits most standard US doors in the stated thickness range.
Cons:- Eight AA batteries are not included.
- Full remote features require a smartphone.
- Setup may feel complex for buyers who want a basic keypad lock.
Best for: Front-door buyers who want quick fingerprint entry plus PIN, physical-key, voice, and app alternatives.
Not ideal for: People who prefer not to use a smartphone for remote management or want a lock with included batteries and simpler setup.
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Access methods:App, fingerprint, PIN, physical key, and voice
- Fingerprint recognition speed:0.2 seconds
- Fingerprint recognition rate:99.99% (manufacturer-stated)
- Battery type:8 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries, not included
- Voice compatibility:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
- Door compatibility:Most standard US doors, 1-3/8 to 2 inches thick
- Warranty:2 years (1-year limited plus 1-year extension)
Our verdict“Choose the VE012W if fast fingerprint access is your priority and you are comfortable handling app setup and battery replacement.”
Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle, Built-in WiFi, App Remote Control
The Philips 4200 Series is the most balanced fit here for buyers who want fingerprint and keypad entry together without giving up direct Wi-Fi app control. Its fingerprint unlock is listed at 0.3 seconds, a little slower on paper than the Veise VE012W’s 0.2-second figure, while the Philips adds a keypad-and-handle format for people who prefer codes or want a familiar lever. Unlike the Schlage Encode, it lists fingerprint access, but it does not have the Schlage’s stated encrypted connection and built-in alarms. No hub is needed, and Alexa and Google Assistant compatibility broadens control options. The practical drawbacks are that batteries are not included and auto-lock must be enabled in the app. The listed door-thickness range is also narrower than the Veise models’. I’d choose it for mixed-access households, provided the door’s handing and fit match the installation requirements.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, keypad, app, and voice access in one lock.
- Built-in 2.4GHz Wi-Fi connects without a hub for remote app control.
- Customizable auto-lock delay can be set from 0 to 180 seconds.
- Includes two lever handles, latch, and mounting hardware.
Cons:- Batteries are not included.
- Auto-lock must be enabled manually in the app.
- Designed primarily for right-opening doors; left-opening doors require a reset.
Best for: Households wanting a handle-set lock with fingerprint, keypad, app, and voice access on a compatible door.
Not ideal for: Buyers with left-opening doors who do not want to reset the lock, or anyone seeking included batteries or auto-lock enabled by default.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW-L
- Connectivity:2.4GHz Wi-Fi; no hub needed
- Access methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, and voice commands
- Fingerprint unlock speed:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock delay:Customizable from 0 to 180 seconds
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Battery type:1.5V alkaline batteries, not included
- Door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches
- Voice compatibility:Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant
Our verdict“Pick the Philips 4200 Series if you want fingerprint and keypad access in a Wi-Fi handle set and your door fits its handing requirements.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock
I’d pick this Philips when a household needs to manage access for many people without handing out physical keys. Its support for up to 100 custom passcodes, detailed access history, and real-time alerts make it better suited to frequent visitors or rotating household access than the Tapo DL100, whose supplied specs emphasize activity logs but do not state a comparable code capacity. Fingerprint entry, app control, a physical key, and Alexa or Google Assistant voice commands also give residents several ways to get in. The tradeoff is reliance on Wi-Fi for remote features, and the product data notes occasional connectivity issues. Setup may also take more effort than a simpler keypad lock. I’d choose it for flexible access tracking, not for a buyer who wants remote control to remain available through a weak or unreliable network.
Pros:- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes for flexible access sharing.
- Combines fingerprint, passcode, physical-key, app, and voice-control entry.
- Real-time alerts and access history help track entry.
- Compatible with Alexa and Google Assistant.
Cons:- Remote app features require a working Wi-Fi connection.
- Setup may feel complex for less technical buyers.
- Product information notes occasional connectivity issues.
Best for: Households with frequent guests, caregivers, or service providers who want many unique passcodes and a record of access.
Not ideal for: Buyers with unreliable home Wi-Fi or those who want a particularly simple setup and minimal reliance on app connectivity.
- Brand:PHILIPS
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, passcode, physical key, voice commands, and app control
- Passcode capacity:Up to 100 custom passcodes
- Remote access:Wi-Fi app control
- Alerts and history:Real-time alerts and detailed access history
- Voice assistant compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant
- Auto-lock:Yes
Our verdict“Choose this Philips if managing many individual access codes matters more than keeping setup and connectivity requirements simple.”
Smart Lock Keypad Door Lock with Handle, WiFi Keyless Entry, Alexa & Google Assistant Compatible, Voice Control, APP Remote, Fingerprint, PIN Code, Mechanical Key
This handle-set lock is aimed at buyers who want more than keypad and app entry: it also accepts a fingerprint, FOB card, and mechanical key. That range gives household members and visitors different ways to enter, while Wi-Fi remote management adds access logs and control when the owner is away. Compared with the eufy Smart Lock C220, which lists Apple Watch access and a physical key, this model adds FOB-card entry and provides a handle rather than a deadbolt-only format. Its stated IP54 rating also makes it a stronger fit for exposure to the elements than the eufy’s IP53 rating. The tradeoffs are a limit of 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes, plus eight AA batteries to monitor. I’d look elsewhere if battery upkeep or a potentially involved setup is a concern.
Pros:- Offers six entry methods, including fingerprint, app, FOB card, and mechanical key.
- Wi-Fi supports remote management and access logs.
- IP54 rating is suited to outdoor exposure.
- Includes auto-lock and Alexa and Google Assistant compatibility.
Cons:- Runs on eight AA batteries, which require periodic replacement.
- Fingerprint and passcode capacities are each limited to 50.
- Setup may be complex, and battery life varies with use.
Best for: Households that want a handle-set lock with several entry choices for residents, visitors, and people who prefer a card or key.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want a low-maintenance power setup, a larger code and fingerprint roster, or the simplest possible installation.
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, passcode, app, voice, FOB card, and mechanical key
- Fingerprint capacity:50
- Passcode capacity:50
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Voice assistant compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant
- Battery power:8 AA batteries
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Certification:ANSI Grade 3
Our verdict“Pick this handle-set model if FOB-card access and weather resistance matter more than minimizing battery and setup demands.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock, Keyless Entry Door Lock
I’d give this Philips the nod for buyers who want the familiar combination of a deadbolt, app access, fingerprint entry, and passcodes without making a long access roster the main priority. The description highlights DIY installation and compatibility with most doors, while real-time notifications and auto-lock address the everyday worry of an unlocked entry. Compared with the other Philips DDL242X-1HW in this group, this listing specifically calls out installation and door fit, while the B0FVWQ8R93 listing specifies support for 100 passcodes and detailed access history. That makes the first a better match for access management at scale. This model’s key limitation is network compatibility: it requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and does not support 5 GHz. Batteries are not included, and there is no door sensor for confirming the door’s physical state.
Pros:- Combines app, fingerprint, passcode, physical-key, and voice entry.
- Description highlights DIY installation and compatibility with most doors.
- Remote access and real-time notifications support off-site monitoring.
- Auto-lock adds a way to secure the deadbolt after entry.
Cons:- Requires a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network and does not support 5 GHz.
- Batteries are not included.
- No door sensor reports the door’s physical open or closed state.
Best for: DIY-minded homeowners with a compatible door and a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network who want app, fingerprint, and passcode entry.
Not ideal for: People whose home network uses only 5 GHz Wi-Fi or who need a sensor that reports whether the door itself is open or closed.
- Brand:PHILIPS
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Lock type:Smart deadbolt
- Entry methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, and voice commands
- Wi-Fi requirement:2.4 GHz; 5 GHz not supported
- Remote features:Remote access and real-time notifications
- Auto-lock:Yes
- Door sensor:Not included
Our verdict“Choose this Philips for DIY-friendly keyless entry if your network has 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and you do not need a door-status sensor.”
Tapo Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Door Lock, Keyless Tactile Buttons, DL100
The Tapo DL100 is the clearest choice here for buyers who want both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, rather than relying on one connection mode for every interaction. Its stated battery life reaches up to 200 days in Wi-Fi mode and 300 days in Bluetooth mode, giving buyers a practical reason to use Bluetooth when remote access is not needed. The app supplies activity logs and real-time notifications, and compatibility includes Alexa, Google Home, and Samsung SmartThings. Compared with the Philips B0F5QKCD3S, the Tapo lists Bluetooth and a broad smart-home ecosystem, while Philips highlights fingerprint entry; fingerprint unlocking is not listed for this Tapo. Its BHMA Grade 3 certification is a standard durability level rather than a higher tier, and installation may take some technical comfort. I’d choose it for connectivity flexibility, not biometric entry.
Pros:- Supports both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity.
- Works with Alexa, Google Home, and Samsung SmartThings.
- Activity logs, real-time notifications, and auto-lock support routine monitoring.
- Battery-life figures are specified for both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth modes.
Cons:- Fingerprint entry is not listed among the unlocking methods.
- BHMA Grade 3 is standard durability, not the highest certification tier.
- Installation may require technical knowledge, and batteries need periodic replacement.
Best for: Smart-home owners who want keypad entry, Bluetooth for local use, and Wi-Fi plus broad platform compatibility for remote management.
Not ideal for: Buyers who specifically want fingerprint unlocking or a lock with a stated certification above BHMA Grade 3.
- Model:DL100
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
- Entry methods:Keypad, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and voice commands
- Smart-home compatibility:Alexa, Google Home, and Samsung SmartThings
- Power:4 AA batteries, included
- Battery life:Up to 200 days in Wi-Fi mode; up to 300 days in Bluetooth mode
- Certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F
- Dimensions:Outdoor: 5.88 x 2.65 x 2.2 inches; indoor: 10.51 x 2.84 x 1.81 inches
Our verdict“Pick the Tapo DL100 if Bluetooth flexibility and smart-home integration matter more to you than fingerprint access.”
eufy Smart Lock C220 – Fingerprint Keyless Entry Door Lock
The eufy C220 stands out for buyers who want remote control without adding a separate Wi-Fi bridge: Wi-Fi is built in. It pairs that with fingerprint, keypad, physical-key, app, Apple Watch, and Alexa or Google voice access, so residents can choose a convenient method while keeping a mechanical key available. Compared with the Tapo DL100, the eufy adds fingerprint recognition and Apple Watch access, while Tapo offers Bluetooth alongside Wi-Fi and lists Samsung SmartThings compatibility. The C220’s stated battery life of up to eight months is useful, but it still runs on eight AA batteries; the product data lists no rechargeable or backup power option. Its IP53 rating and BHMA Grade 3 certification provide practical baseline protection, though buyers seeking a higher certification tier should look elsewhere.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote access without a separate bridge.
- Six listed entry options include fingerprint, Apple Watch, voice, and physical key.
- Up to eight months of stated battery life on included AA batteries.
- Fits standard deadbolts under 54 mm without drilling, according to the product data.
Cons:- Uses eight AA batteries and has no listed rechargeable or backup power option.
- IP53 and BHMA Grade 3 may not suit buyers seeking stronger weather protection or certification.
- Does not list Bluetooth connectivity.
Best for: Homeowners who want fingerprint entry and remote Wi-Fi control without buying a separate bridge, especially those who use Apple Watch.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want rechargeable or backup power, Bluetooth connectivity, or a certification above BHMA Grade 3.
- Model:T8506
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, and Alexa or Google voice
- Wi-Fi:Built-in; no bridge required
- Power:8 AA batteries, included
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Certification:BHMA Grade 3
- Fit and installation:Standard deadbolts with bores under 54 mm; no drilling required
Our verdict“Choose the eufy C220 if bridge-free Wi-Fi and fingerprint access are priorities and replacing AA batteries is acceptable.”

How We Picked
I ranked these locks by how well their stated features answer the specific need for keyless entry with Wi-Fi remote access. I gave more weight to clear access-method options, practical app-based control, and product descriptions that distinguish a deadbolt from a full handle set. I also considered everyday usability factors such as auto-lock, backup keys, fingerprint access, and stated weather protection, while treating compatibility claims as features to verify rather than assuming they work with every home setup.
The order favors options with a distinct use case and a relatively clear balance of convenience and backup access. The Schlage Encode ranks first as the most direct Wi-Fi deadbolt recommendation; Wyze and eufy follow for buyers who put fingerprint entry first. Other models may suit buyers seeking a handle set or several entry methods, but similar listings, limited differentiating details, and fit requirements make it harder to rank them above the clearer standouts. I did not treat a longer feature list as an automatic advantage: door compatibility, dependable fallback access, and the buyer’s preferred entry routine matter more.
| smart door lock keyless wifi | Battery life |
|---|---|
| TEEHO TE012W-H WiFi Fingerprin | — |
| Built-in WiFi Fingerprint Smar | Up to 6 months |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | — |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock | — |
| Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 Fingerp | — |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Door Lock | Up to 6 months |
| Veise VE027-K WiFi Smart Deadb | Up to 240 days |
| Schlage Encode Smart WiFi Dead | Up to 6 months |
| Veise VE012W WiFi Fingerprint | — |
| Philips WiFi Keypad Deadbolt w | Up to 6 months |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | — |
| Smart Lock Keypad Door Lock wi | Up to 8 months |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | — |
| Tapo Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Door | Up to 200 days in Wi-Fi mode; up to 300 days in Bluetooth mode |
| eufy Smart Lock C220 | Up to 8 months |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Smart Door Lock Keyless Wifi
Choosing a Wi-Fi lock is less about collecting the most entry methods and more about avoiding a mismatch between the lock, the door, and the way your household gets inside. I would settle the physical fit and backup plan before comparing app features.
Choose a Deadbolt or a Handle Set Before Comparing Features
A deadbolt replacement is usually the simpler choice if your existing handle works and you only want to add smart access. A full handle set can create a more coordinated installation, but it involves more hardware and more ways for measurements to be wrong. Check door thickness, backset, bore-hole size, latch dimensions, and handle handing against the specific lock’s instructions. Do not assume that two products labeled for a front door share the same fit. If you are replacing both the handle and lock, confirm the included parts cover your door configuration. When the listing is unclear, prioritize a model with a clear installation template or contact the seller before buying.
Decide Which Entry Method You Will Actually Use
A fingerprint reader is convenient when you often arrive with your hands full, but it may not be the best primary method for every household member. A keypad is easier to share with guests and service providers, while a mechanical key offers a familiar fallback. Cards can be useful for some users, but they add another item to carry and keep track of. More entry methods can make a lock flexible, yet they may also add setup steps and potential points of confusion. Choose one everyday method and at least one backup that remains available if a finger is not recognized or a phone is unavailable. Check whether the exact model includes each method; similar product names do not guarantee identical features.
Treat Wi-Fi Remote Access as a Convenience, Not Your Only Way In
Built-in Wi-Fi can let you manage access remotely without relying on a separate bridge, which is useful for guest arrivals or checking lock status away from home. It also makes home-network compatibility and app reliability part of the purchase decision. Confirm the supported Wi-Fi band and any app, account, or voice-assistant requirements in the product details. Ask yourself what should happen if your internet connection drops: a local keypad or physical key can matter more than remote control at that moment. Voice control is an extra convenience, not a substitute for secure access settings. Keep an entry method that does not depend on your router or phone.
Plan for Batteries, Auto-Lock, and Household Routines
Auto-lock can reduce the chance of leaving a door unsecured, but the timing needs to suit how your household moves through the entrance. A short delay may cause frustration when carrying bags, while a long one may defeat the purpose. Check how the lock signals low batteries and whether the backup method is practical when power runs down. Wi-Fi, fingerprint scanning, and frequent app communication can all influence battery demands, so do not compare battery claims without checking what conditions they assume. Set an alert or calendar reminder after installation rather than waiting for a warning at the door. For a busy home, simple controls and easy battery access can matter more than rarely used smart features.
Check Weather Exposure and Door Placement
Exterior locks face rain, temperature shifts, dust, and direct sun, but not every entry gets the same exposure. A stated weather-resistance rating, such as the Wyze model’s IP53 listing, can help buyers compare protection claims, though it does not mean a lock is suitable for every uncovered doorway. Consider whether the keypad or fingerprint sensor sits under an awning and whether water can collect around the hardware. A sheltered side entrance may have different needs from a front door exposed to wind and rain. Follow the manufacturer’s care and installation guidance rather than adding a cover that could interfere with sensors or buttons. If the door is highly exposed, prioritize explicit environmental specifications over a longer list of app features.
Compare Exact Model Numbers and Accessory Requirements
Product names can be very similar even when the included hardware or entry methods differ. This roundup contains repeated Philips deadbolt listings and several related Philips and Veise models, so read the precise model number and listing details before choosing. Confirm whether a bridge, handle, card, backup key, or other accessory is included or sold separately. Check the current compatibility information for your phone, smart-home platform, and home network instead of relying on a broad Alexa or Google compatibility label. Also compare warranty terms and the availability of replacement parts, since a lock is a long-term door fixture. A careful listing check can prevent paying for features you cannot use or receiving hardware that does not match your door.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a Wi-Fi bridge for the locks in this roundup?
Several listings specifically describe built-in Wi-Fi, which is intended to support remote app access without a separate bridge. Do not assume every lock in the lineup works the same way just because it is called a smart lock. Check the exact model’s connection requirements, supported Wi-Fi band, and whether remote features require an account or subscription. A bridge may still be needed for some models or particular smart-home functions. If avoiding extra hardware is a priority, confirm that point in the manufacturer’s specifications before ordering.
Should I choose a fingerprint lock or a keypad lock for a household with guests?
A keypad is often easier to share because guests can use a code without registering a fingerprint or borrowing a device. Fingerprint access is more personal and convenient for regular household members, but it can require setup for each user and may not suit every visitor. Some models combine fingerprint and keypad entry, giving the household a daily shortcut while keeping guest access simple. Check whether temporary or scheduled codes are supported if you regularly host visitors or service providers. Also decide how you will remove or change access after a guest no longer needs it.
Can I install one of these locks if I want to keep my existing door handle?
A standalone deadbolt may let you retain a working handle, while a product sold with a handle is intended for a different hardware setup. The listing title alone may not tell you whether the lock can be separated from the included handle or whether the parts are designed to work together. Compare the installation diagram with your current bore holes, backset, door thickness, and latch arrangement. If those measurements do not match, installation can require changes to the door or a different lock choice. Confirm the exact package contents and fit requirements before buying.
Will a Wi-Fi smart lock still let me in if my internet goes down?
Remote app control may be unavailable when your internet or home Wi-Fi is down, but local entry methods can still work depending on the model. A keypad, fingerprint reader, card, or mechanical key can provide alternatives that do not rely on a live remote connection. The available fallback methods vary across the products in this roundup, so check the exact model rather than relying on a general product-family description. Keep a backup key accessible without placing it somewhere obvious outside the home. If outages are common where you live, prioritize a lock with a local method you are comfortable using.
How do I choose between the Schlage Encode, Wyze Bolt v2, and eufy C220?
I would start with the entry method that matters most in your daily routine. The Schlage Encode is the clearest match if you want a Wi-Fi deadbolt as the primary feature, while Wyze Bolt v2 and eufy C220 are more appealing when fingerprint entry is a leading reason to upgrade. Wyze also lists IP53 weather resistance, which may be relevant for a more exposed installation, though the door’s conditions still need checking. Compare physical fit, app requirements, backup access, and the exact features included before deciding. Pick the model whose main strength matches your use rather than choosing by feature count alone.
Conclusion
My best overall pick is the Schlage Encode for buyers who want a Wi-Fi deadbolt and remote access in a familiar format. For fingerprint-focused entry, compare the Wyze Auto-Lock Bolt v2 and eufy Smart Lock C220, with Wyze offering a stated weather-resistance detail that may matter at exposed doors. I would treat best value as the model that fits your existing hardware and includes the entry methods you will use, rather than simply the one with the longest feature list; verify the exact listing, especially among the repeated Philips models. For beginners, a straightforward deadbolt with a keypad or key backup may be easier to manage than a handle replacement with multiple access methods. If you specifically need a handle set, several Philips, Veise, TEEHO, and multi-method options address that use case, but confirm door measurements and package contents first. Match the lock to your door, choose a fallback entry method, and then decide which smart features are worth adding.















